Which statement best represents the WHO's stance on mass culling of stray dogs for rabies control?

The correct response reflects the World Health Organization's position that emphasizes a more nuanced approach to rabies control rather than resorting to mass culling of stray dogs. The stance indicates that while cost considerations and the ineffectiveness of mass cullings can be significant factors, they do not warrant prioritization within rabies control protocols. This perspective aligns with WHO guidelines recommending the implementation of more humane and effective strategies, such as vaccination and responsible dog population management, which ultimately contribute to reducing rabies transmission without the ethical concerns and social backlash associated with culling.

The underlying principle is rooted in public health strategies that seek to address issues like rabies in ways that are not only cost-effective but also ethical and sustainable in the long run. This helps provide a foundation for more comprehensive control measures that focus on prevention rather than elimination.

The other options do not capture the WHO’s emphasis on humane methods and the ineffectiveness of mass culling in controlling rabies, which illustrates why the selected statement aligns more closely with current health guidelines and practices.